Feature
Generic security questionnaires get generic answers. Questions based on actual scan findings get real conversations.
After we scan your vendor, we generate specific, evidence-based questions from the actual findings. These are questions your vendor can't dismiss with "yes, we're compliant." They have to address the specific issue.
Finding: Source maps publicly accessible at app.example.com
We observed that your application at app.example.com serves JavaScript source maps publicly. This exposes your full source code including internal API routes and configuration. Can you confirm whether this is intentional and what data is potentially exposed?
Finding: Pre-consent tracking detected (Google Analytics, HotJar)
Our analysis detected Google Analytics and HotJar loading before any user interaction on your website, without a prior consent mechanism. Given that you process our customer data, can you clarify your position on pre-consent tracking and your GDPR compliance approach for cookie consent?
Finding: DMARC policy set to none
Your email domain has a DMARC policy set to "none", which means spoofed emails using your domain are not blocked or quarantined. Are you planning to enforce a reject or quarantine policy, and what is your timeline?
Most vendor security questionnaires are templates. "Do you encrypt data at rest?" "Do you have a SOC 2 report?" Every vendor answers yes. The answers tell you nothing about their actual security posture.
Questions generated from scan findings are different. They reference specific, observable issues. Your vendor knows you've done your homework. The conversation shifts from checkbox compliance to real security.